Fashions come and go
quickly, but internet sensations travel at the speed of light. Who could have
(or would have) predicted that the colors of a striped dress would be such a popular
topic of conversation and debate (if only for a few hours). Was the dress white
and gold, or blue and black? The colors were clear, even to someone like me who
does not readily participate in color games. Why play when you know you are
going to lose? Is that sport coat caramel or gold, the shirt – cherry or merely
red?
Variations in shades of
color are one of those things that are defined in the eye of the beholder – it
often is subjective (based on personal opinions and beliefs), whereas an
objective view can be measured and observed. People will often disagree on
issues where there is no clear answer, yet they find it impossible to entertain
the other side’s perspective.
Is the sound system volume
too high? Ginger or Mary Ann? Stripes, plaids or neither? There is simply no
accounting for taste. I will like what I like and you may like what you like –
can’t we all just get along?
But what about the issues
that lie on a grander scale – those that have important immediate consequences
or eternal significance? When the discussion involves topics such as choosing
abortion instead of adoption, accepting creation over evolution, professing to
know God or preferring no god, the tone can be less than cordial.
I have my opinions, and
like many friends of mine, I will be happy to share them at the drop of a hat,
or cap (if you prefer). To keep the number of friends from dwindling, it is
important to tailor my words when broaching a potentially sensitive subject.
Bernard Meltzer said “If
you have learned how to disagree without being disagreeable, then you have
discovered the secret of getting along – whether it be business, family
relations, or life itself.” I haven’t
learned yet.
There are those that will
end a discussion by agreeing to disagree. I don’t usually go along with that. I
always want to make sure the other person sees it my way. This, of course,
leads to problems. I can more readily tolerate another person’s perspective
only if I believe they have understood mine. Dennis Prager says, “I prefer
clarity over agreement.” Indeed, I have
so much to learn.
Last Thursday at the
office Kathy, Ruth and I were divided over what color the dress was. What was remarkable
is that I was allied with one of them.
Usually in the matters of colors I am left standing alone, embarrassed
and humiliated. But this time, I witnessed two women, who were looking at the
same picture, disagree (without being disagreeable) over what color this stupid
dress was.
At first I thought I was
being teased and set–up for a joke. But, in the end, it came down to a matter
of perspective and lighting. While the subjects of religion and politics have
fallen out of fashion, most of us can still calmly discuss the color of a
dress.
All that glitters is not
gold – I have learned it might be black. Truth doesn’t change – we just need to
be enlightened.
No comments:
Post a Comment